jackiewmarketing@gmail.com, Author at The Law Offices of Stephen J. Natoli - Page 2 of 2

Appellate Panel Rules on Unusual Court House-hallway Identification of Defendant

In State v. Michael Guerino (Ocean County) an appellate panel examined the scope of Rule 3:11, which requires law enforcement to make a detailed record of an

New Jersey Supreme Court Rejects Challenge to Kidnapping Conviction

On August 4, 2020 the New Jersey Supreme Court rendered its opinion on a challenge to a Defendant’s kidnapping conviction in State v. Juan E.

Courts Can Now Compel People to Disclose Their Cell Phone Passwords Without Violating the Fifth Amendment

On August 10, 2020 the New Jersey Supreme Court issued its opinion in State v. Andrews. The Court ruled that a court order mandating that

2 of 2
« Previous
1
2

Personal Attention. Common Sense Advice. Proven Results.

Office Locations

Secaucus Office
766 Irving Place
Secaucus, NJ 07094
Get Directions

Jersey City Office
549 Summit Ave
Jersey City, NJ 07306
Get Directions

Recent Posts

Founder Stephen J. Natoli Selected as Rising Star on Superlawyers

May 24, 2021

Prosecutors Cannot Condition Entry into Pre-trial Intervention on Defendants Agreeing to Jail Time

December 24, 2020

Follow Our Instagram

attorney_steve_n

#hudsoncounty #criminaldefense @stevie_n10

#hudsoncounty #criminaldefense @stevie_n10

A full discussion of this recent case can be found

A full discussion of this recent case can be found in the link in our bio. #njsupremecourt

Recently 3 Rutgers Fraternity brothers secured a w

Recently 3 Rutgers Fraternity brothers secured a win in an appeals court after drunkenly lighting part of their property on fire and being charged criminally. Swipe to read a summary of the appellate decision. #jerseycitycriminallawyer

@t.a.n.y.a_1006 brought some holiday cheer to our

@t.a.n.y.a_1006 brought some holiday cheer to our entrance 🎅🏻🧑🏻‍🎄🎄

Thoughts? #sjnlawyer #jerseycitycriminallawyers

Thoughts?
#sjnlawyer #jerseycitycriminallawyers #guncharges #drugcharges #homicidecharges

Text messages are often used against an accused pe

Text messages are often used against an accused person to support a criminal charge. In the appellate decision discussed here we see how courts have limited a person’s ability to challenge sent text messages if recovered on the recipient’s phone.
#sjnlawyer #criminaldefenselawyer #jerseycity #secaucus #textmessages #guncharges #drugcharges #hudsoncounty #criminaldefenseattorney

As of October 8th, as part of an effort to keep fo

As of October 8th, as part of an effort to keep folks from languishing in jail awaiting indictment a new court rule requiring the Prosecutor to present at least one live witness in support of probable cause has been adopted. At that hearing, unlike grand jury, defense counsel can be present and cross examine state’s witnesses. Hearsay is permissible and the defendant does have the right to put on his or her own case. If the court finds a lack of probable cause, the charges will be dismissed. However, double jeopardy does not attach and the State can charge again. #sjnlawyer #defense #hudsoncounty #guncharges #drugcharges

Got to the office this morning to find this. Nice

Got to the office this morning to find this. Nice to be a part of a community like secaucus. #thesmallthings #secaucusrocks

In a first of its kind decision, the NJ Supreme Co

In a first of its kind decision, the NJ Supreme Court held that under certain circumstances, compelling an individual to disclose his cell phone password does not violate his Fifth amendment right against self incrimination. Justice LaVecchia dissented against what she viewed as forced disclosure of mental thoughts and a break from longstanding Fifth Amendment protection. #sjnlawyer #hudsoncounty #jerseycity #secaucus

Load More... Follow on Instagram

© Copyright 2017 – The Law Offices of Stephen J. Natoli LLC. The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.